skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

To F. J. Cohn   2 September 1875

Down, | Beckenham, Kent.

Sep 2. 1875

My dear Sir

I had resolved not to trouble you with another letter, but I cannot resist thanking you for your last note. When you have watched the aggregated masses in the cells of the tentacles for some little time, under a high power, you will be able to judge whether any other substance except protoplasm undergoes such movements.1 Your remark about the acid passing thro’ the cell-membrane of the glands when irritated has led me to think that this probably is the explanation of the process of aggregation; for, as I have attempted to show (supported as my view is by Gorup-Besanez p.362 of my book) that protoplasm is held in solution by a ferment (the same which gives to Drosera the power of digestion) together with an acid; consequently as soon as the acid passes outwards, the protoplasm is precipitated, & then displays its characteristic spontaneous movements.2 If this view is correct, it would have to be extended to the roots of Drosera, Euphorbia &c (p. 64— & 141) with this difference, that in these cases the Carbonate of Ammonia is absorbed by the roots & unites with some free acid, causing the precipitation of the protoplasm.3 I am however aware that I ought to have worked more on the roots of plants, & on the action of Carb. of Ammonia on the grains of Chlorophyll but time & strength failed me. You are very good to speak so encouragingly about my observations on the so-called process of aggregation.4

I have addressed this note to Breslau, from not knowing how long you will remain at your present residence.5

My dear Sir | yours sincerely | Charles Darwin

Footnotes

Cohn had written to CD about his uncertainty regarding the protoplasmic nature of aggregated masses in cells of the tentacles of Drosera rotundifolia (the common or round-leaved sundew); see letters from F. J. Cohn, 21 August 1875 and 28 August 1875, and letter to F. J. Cohn, 24 August 1875.
In Insectivorous plants, p 362, CD pointed out that all plants had the power of digesting ‘albuminous or proteid substances’, and speculated that this was effected by a solvent, consisting of ‘a ferment together with an acid’. He cited a paper by Eugen Franz von Gorup-Besanez, who had discovered that vetch seeds contained a ferment that dissolved albuminous substances (Gorup-Besanez 1874).
In Insectivorous plants, p. 64, CD noted that he had observed a process like aggregation in roots of Euphorbia peplus (petty spurge) placed in solution of carbonate of ammonia; in ibid., p. 141, he described the effect of carbonate of ammonia on Drosera roots.
Insectivorous plants, pp. 38–65. In his letter of 28 August 1875, Cohn described CD’s discovery as ‘the most important in biology of our time’.
Breslau in Prussia (Germany) is now Wrocław in Poland. Cohn had written from Liebwerda in Bohemia (now the Czech Republic; letter from F. J. Cohn, 28 August 1875).

Bibliography

Gorup-Besanez, Eugen Franz von. 1874. Ueber das Vorkommen eines diastatischen und peptonbildenden Ferments in den Wickensamen. [Read 9 November 1874.] Berichte der Deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft zu Berlin 7: 1478–80.

Insectivorous plants. By Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1875.

Summary

Further discussion of the process of aggregation in response to [10137].

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-10150A
From
Charles Robert Darwin
To
Ferdinand Julius Cohn
Sent from
Down
Source of text
DAR 185: 100
Physical description
LS(A) 4pp

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 10150A,” accessed on 18 May 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-10150A.xml

Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 23

letter